omeya
08-18 09:10 AM
Thanks txh1b.
wallpaper stock photo : lack and white
hoser7
02-25 11:35 AM
I was recently on H1B and renewal/extension was denied. So I left promptly to go back to Canada to establish residence there and start working. Now I need to return to the USA to retrieve some personal belongings, wrap up my residence and bring a car back etc...
My question is, when I enter the USA for the first time after being denied H1B will I have a hard time and will they be reluctant for some reason to permit me to enter as a visitor? I can't see why they would but who knows???
My family is still in the US and I need to help to get them prepared to come back
My question is, when I enter the USA for the first time after being denied H1B will I have a hard time and will they be reluctant for some reason to permit me to enter as a visitor? I can't see why they would but who knows???
My family is still in the US and I need to help to get them prepared to come back
black_logs
02-01 12:04 PM
Just a reminder. We are having this conference call today
2011 3-1/8quot; Crystal Globe Award On
gccovet
07-28 08:19 AM
Hi,
My Case: EB3-I, PD=5/2004, I-140 Approved, July 07 filer.
Being infected by COTLS, I checked my status @USCIS.gov (as EAD filed, end of May (Paper based)@TSC- NO movement as of today.) I got a soft LUD on 7/13 on my already approved I-140 (approved mid of 2006).
I had earlier read a thread where people were talking about LUD on their cases dated 7/13/08. I was surprised as I am EB3-I.
Anybody has insight on this case? Any comments?
I will go take a chill pill as of now (to try to get rid of COLTS).
You all have a great Monday.
GCCovet
My Case: EB3-I, PD=5/2004, I-140 Approved, July 07 filer.
Being infected by COTLS, I checked my status @USCIS.gov (as EAD filed, end of May (Paper based)@TSC- NO movement as of today.) I got a soft LUD on 7/13 on my already approved I-140 (approved mid of 2006).
I had earlier read a thread where people were talking about LUD on their cases dated 7/13/08. I was surprised as I am EB3-I.
Anybody has insight on this case? Any comments?
I will go take a chill pill as of now (to try to get rid of COLTS).
You all have a great Monday.
GCCovet
more...
Scythe
10-28 10:28 PM
It looks to me like the PNG is larger than normal but the button itself is smaller.
fetch_gc
09-05 05:08 PM
No receipts for 485 pkg to NSC on July 16th,2007 at 11.16 am, signed by F.HEINAUER
Anybody in th same boat??
Thx
FETCH_GC
Anybody in th same boat??
Thx
FETCH_GC
more...
saibaba
12-18 03:43 PM
No, just what is asked in the RFE. Your atterney will handle it.
thanq brother..
will try to get new pics rightaway and will send them to attorney...
thanq brother..
will try to get new pics rightaway and will send them to attorney...
2010 A 3d Black And White Globe
Blog Feeds
08-02 07:10 AM
Immigration Lawyers Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
In an effort to increase aviation security, DHS has announced its "If You See Something, Say Something� campaign which seeks the public�s support in reporting any suspicious aviation activity. Also, DHS will streamline the pre-screening process for passengers and crews traveling to and from the U.S. by allowing the carrier to submit a single manifest to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's on-line data system.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~4/4_wygeQf7uw
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~3/4_wygeQf7uw/dhs_increases_aviation_securit.html)
In an effort to increase aviation security, DHS has announced its "If You See Something, Say Something� campaign which seeks the public�s support in reporting any suspicious aviation activity. Also, DHS will streamline the pre-screening process for passengers and crews traveling to and from the U.S. by allowing the carrier to submit a single manifest to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's on-line data system.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~4/4_wygeQf7uw
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~3/4_wygeQf7uw/dhs_increases_aviation_securit.html)
more...
CRAZYMONK
07-27 09:41 AM
These are the documents needed for AC 21 I 140 Approval, Labor Certification, I485 Reciept, Offer Letter from company B (make sure you have the same job title and the same salary as of your labor certification)
hair White Replacement Globe
headless_pnub
08-18 05:23 AM
Very impressive for your first try. Nice.
more...
nish2006
01-28 01:21 PM
Hi,
My employers are considering transfering me to another group company (different name) during the next 1-2 months. My job profile will remain unchanged, but the employer name/address (on paychecks, etc) will be different after the transfer. My I-140 is still pending (filed in Aug 2007 together with I-485 at NSC under EB-3).
I'd greatly appreciate anyone's advice on the following:
a) If I transfer before my I-140 is approved, do I need to notify USCIS in writing? If so, does any specific paperwork need to be filled out? My employers have assured me they will continue to support my I-140/485 under the original company name, for as long as required.
b) If I transfer after approval of I-140 (fingers crossed!), do I need to notify USCIS? Again, is any specific paperwork necessary?
Many thanks in advance.
My employers are considering transfering me to another group company (different name) during the next 1-2 months. My job profile will remain unchanged, but the employer name/address (on paychecks, etc) will be different after the transfer. My I-140 is still pending (filed in Aug 2007 together with I-485 at NSC under EB-3).
I'd greatly appreciate anyone's advice on the following:
a) If I transfer before my I-140 is approved, do I need to notify USCIS in writing? If so, does any specific paperwork need to be filled out? My employers have assured me they will continue to support my I-140/485 under the original company name, for as long as required.
b) If I transfer after approval of I-140 (fingers crossed!), do I need to notify USCIS? Again, is any specific paperwork necessary?
Many thanks in advance.
hot Black amp;amp; white globe .
jacomonguy
03-16 05:49 AM
HI, i filed for my sons GC with an i-130. i received an I-797C saying it had been approved n a priority date of 02/26/2004. we have been waiting for years now i just checked the priority date and its already past that if im reading correctly its now at july 04...i am a US resident. i called the NVC but the automated service told me they are still processing visas from 1999?? What should i do?? can anyone give me decent advice on this? Thank you...
more...
house lack and white using
desitechie
01-08 06:21 PM
I94 date doesnt matter for entry on AP as parolee status.
Just continue on H1 or EAD whichever you have been using and keep extending AP too for travel.
Just continue on H1 or EAD whichever you have been using and keep extending AP too for travel.
tattoo Black and White Copiers Colour
vinoddas
09-06 03:04 AM
I am planning to get religiously married by end of next year, 2009. But I am considering doing a quick court marriage in the next week since my dates are current. I have a couple questions regarding time frame:
1. If I do get my GC soon, then I need to apply for following-to-join. Is there a time limit for this? Can I do it as late as I want, as long as the spouse doesnt come to US before?
2. If I do not get GC for a while, is there a time frame after marriage before which I have to apply for my spouse's 485 as a dependent? Does she also need to be on H4 and in US before applying for 485?
Thanks a lot for all the help. I am relatively clueless about this marriage related GC business.
1. If I do get my GC soon, then I need to apply for following-to-join. Is there a time limit for this? Can I do it as late as I want, as long as the spouse doesnt come to US before?
2. If I do not get GC for a while, is there a time frame after marriage before which I have to apply for my spouse's 485 as a dependent? Does she also need to be on H4 and in US before applying for 485?
Thanks a lot for all the help. I am relatively clueless about this marriage related GC business.
more...
pictures lack and white Infinite
yuvarajc
09-14 08:31 AM
Thank you for the link.
dresses 3D BLACK AND WHITE EARTH GLOBE
JeffDG
03-30 11:41 AM
I initially voted in favour of this, but on further reflection, I think this is bad policy and urge others to not support this.
Giving I-485 benefits to people without current PDs is a bad idea. It creates a class of immigrants who are neither non-immigrant visa holders (h1b) nor are they lawful permanent residents (i-551) with a set of rights that falls into neither category. The AoS pending status is intended as a short-duration temporary "gap" coverage for people who are a matter of months from having actual I-551 rights.
Essentially, this proposal aims to make every month into the July 2007 fiasco. In addition, and this is the truly horrible part of it, relieves US employers of the pressure and costs they feel now, extending H1Bs every 3 years. That means that the only allies that legal EB immigrants have (US Employers who require their services) are detached from the immigrants themselves...they no longer have a dog in the hunt, and will stop whatever pressure they are bringing to bear now upon Congresscritters and Senators to increase the number of EB visas available.
Disconnecting the interests of foreign-national employees from their US employers will weaken the political position of the foreign-national employees. We cannot vote or contribute to campaigns, our employers however, can do both. If employees are shifted to EADs and APs, with no further involvement of employers in their immigration status needed, then those employers become disconnected from the process, and the one and only ally the legal immigrant has is no longer interested. That's a horrible thing for the immigrant to advocate.
I strongly urge IV to back away from this proposal, as it is not in the long-term interests of the EB Immigrant community. I urge IV to instead focus their resources on items that will help immigrants long term, like increasing the number of EB visas available through initiatives like eliminating the DV program and allocating the visas to EB applicants.
Giving I-485 benefits to people without current PDs is a bad idea. It creates a class of immigrants who are neither non-immigrant visa holders (h1b) nor are they lawful permanent residents (i-551) with a set of rights that falls into neither category. The AoS pending status is intended as a short-duration temporary "gap" coverage for people who are a matter of months from having actual I-551 rights.
Essentially, this proposal aims to make every month into the July 2007 fiasco. In addition, and this is the truly horrible part of it, relieves US employers of the pressure and costs they feel now, extending H1Bs every 3 years. That means that the only allies that legal EB immigrants have (US Employers who require their services) are detached from the immigrants themselves...they no longer have a dog in the hunt, and will stop whatever pressure they are bringing to bear now upon Congresscritters and Senators to increase the number of EB visas available.
Disconnecting the interests of foreign-national employees from their US employers will weaken the political position of the foreign-national employees. We cannot vote or contribute to campaigns, our employers however, can do both. If employees are shifted to EADs and APs, with no further involvement of employers in their immigration status needed, then those employers become disconnected from the process, and the one and only ally the legal immigrant has is no longer interested. That's a horrible thing for the immigrant to advocate.
I strongly urge IV to back away from this proposal, as it is not in the long-term interests of the EB Immigrant community. I urge IV to instead focus their resources on items that will help immigrants long term, like increasing the number of EB visas available through initiatives like eliminating the DV program and allocating the visas to EB applicants.
more...
makeup of lack and white globe
vinzak
03-29 04:18 AM
you can claim him if:
1) He didn't earn more than $3500 in 2010
2) You have proof of providing more than 50% of his expenses (ie. paid his tuition etc.)
3) He was in the US for more than 180 days in 2010 (ie. US resident for tax purposes)
If you paid for his tuition, you may be able to claim tuition credits for him too.
1) He didn't earn more than $3500 in 2010
2) You have proof of providing more than 50% of his expenses (ie. paid his tuition etc.)
3) He was in the US for more than 180 days in 2010 (ie. US resident for tax purposes)
If you paid for his tuition, you may be able to claim tuition credits for him too.
girlfriend Globe Culprit Hi Shoes
Blog Feeds
05-12 07:10 AM
Mexican-born Tucson, Arizona police officer could easily keep a low profile on SB 1070. He's a naturalized citizen and could just keep his mouth shut regarding his concerns over the bill. Instead, Officer Escobar is the plaintiff in the first lawsuit challenging the new Arizona law. According to the Arizona Daily Star: But in the wake of the April 23 signing of SB 1070, which forces police officers in Arizona to question suspects' citizenship if they have 'reasonable suspicion' that person may be in this country illegally, Escobar emerged as an unlikely hero to the law's opponents - and has...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/05/immigrant-of-the-day-martin-escobar-civil-rights-activist-police-officerjiujitsu-champ.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/05/immigrant-of-the-day-martin-escobar-civil-rights-activist-police-officerjiujitsu-champ.html)
hairstyles of a Black And White Santa
kirupa
02-27 03:17 AM
Here is my entry everyone:
http://www.kirupa.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=33917&d=1141003343
:rambo:
http://www.kirupa.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=33917&d=1141003343
:rambo:
aebuddy
10-12 04:15 PM
Haha that helped out ALOT...thanks
Acm928
01-22 11:25 PM
Hi, I was wondering how long it is going to take me to get my citizenship. I received my permanent residency when I was 17. I was told I could have gotten my citizenship then but since I married a military personnel I wasn't sure if I was still eligible. Can I get my citizenship now because I received my "green card" under age or would I still have to wait 3 years being married to a U.S Citizen? Can I get my citizenship faster being married to a military personnel?
No comments:
Post a Comment